Hair Growth Gummies, Clinically Studied?When a supplement says "clinically studied," what exactly was studied?

"Supports Hair Growth"

Finished product testedThe exact thing you'd buy was in the actual trial.

Ingredient studiedOne ingredient inside it was tested — on its own, maybe in a different formula.

Study merely mentionedA citation appears nearby with no clear link to either.

Reduce it to four questions. Ask them on anything.

What exactly is the company claiming?

Which ingredient is that claim attached to?

Does the cited study actually exist?

Does that study involve what the company says it involves?

Folly Nutrition Hair Health Gummies, two flavor bags

The Test Case

Folly Nutrition Hair Growth Gummies

30+ named ingredients, each with its own cited mechanism. Three of them sit on a real research trail we can actually follow — not just take the vendor's word for.

MSM Zinc B-Vitamins

Not "does a study exist somewhere." Does this study actually exist, independently of the sales page?

Folly's claim Ingredient Study reference ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06174441

Randomized

Not self-selected

Double-blind

Neither side knew

Placebo-controlled

Compared to nothing

Participants

24 weeks

Duration

Ljubljana

VIST Institute of Cosmetics

Verified directly on ClinicalTrials.gov — not just taken from Folly's own citation.

Did Folly claim this trial tested the finished Hair Growth Gummies?

That's exactly how the citation should be written.

Skepticism isn't the same as cynicism. Checking a claim isn't about proving every company wrong — it's about finding out what survives the check. The result changed here because the evidence changed. That's what credibility actually looks like.

Two things worth knowing — sized honestly

Unsourced marketing statistic Folly's homepage states "84% of customers report thicker, fuller hair in under 30 days" and "51% Faster Results Than average hair supplement." Neither has a footnote, a linked study, or a disclosed survey method anywhere on the site. Not a fabricated clinical number — just an unsourced marketing claim, worth labeling as exactly that.

Subscription-first pricing The prominently displayed $49/bag price requires subscribing. The real one-time, no-commitment price is $89/bag. Common for DTC brands, not deceptive — the full review breaks down exactly what Folly charges either way.

Now you have the test. Run it on Folly yourself.

Four checks, the same ones from this page — click each to confirm.

A real, registered study exists (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06174441)

The ingredients overlap with Folly's actual formula (MSM, zinc, B-vitamins)

Folly does NOT claim the finished gummy itself was clinically tested

The citation's wording preserves that distinction

Read Our Full Folly Nutrition Review →

Healthy Health Secrets is reader-supported. This page carries no affiliate links; the review it leads to does, and we say so plainly there. Nothing here is medical advice. See how we check claims like this →

Do hair gummies actually work at all? What the real research says →

Does the biotin on every hair-gummy label actually do anything? What the research really shows →

What about the zinc on the label? Does zinc deficiency actually cause hair loss? →